<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
  <title>The Law Register</title>
  <link>https://theregister.in</link>
  <description>Indian commercial law, written as if it might actually matter to you. Real cases. Real moves. The doctrines that change outcomes — not the ones you memorised for the bar.</description>
  <item>
    <title>10 bonus marks for staying in your district? The court said no.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/10-bonus-marks-for-staying-in-your-district-the/</link>
    <category>Commercial Disputes</category>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court struck down 10 bonus marks for teachers who opted for their current district, ruling the condition violated both statutory rules and constitutional guarantees against residence-based discrimination.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>100% disability awarded. Two lakhs for pain. The Supreme Court said no.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/100-disability-awarded-two-lakhs-for-pain-the-supreme/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A 29-year-old in a persistent vegetative state was awarded Rs 2 lakh for pain and suffering until the Supreme Court rejected the mechanical application of the Raj Kumar formula.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>12 years apart, but court said no divorce—until Supreme Court stepped in</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/12-years-apart-but-court-said-no-divorceuntil-supreme/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>A couple married in 2007, separated since 2010. Lower courts refused to end the marriage. The Supreme Court found a way using a rarely used power.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>12 years apart, marriage still alive? Supreme Court says no</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/12-years-apart-marriage-still-alive-supreme-court-says/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>Couple separated since 2010, bitterness undimmed. Court invokes Article 142 to grant divorce, calling it cruelty to keep them tied.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>12 years apart, still married. SC says: that's cruelty</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/12-years-apart-still-married-sc-says-thats-cruelty/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>Couple separated since 2010. Husband wanted divorce. Courts refused. Then SC stepped in with a surprising logic.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>12 years apart, still married. Then the Supreme Court stepped in.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/12-years-apart-still-married-then-the-supreme-court/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>A couple separated for over a decade, with bitterness on both sides, was denied divorce by two courts. The Supreme Court found a way—by calling the dead marriage itself a form of cruelty.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>13-page bail rejection was struck down — because it discussed evidence.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/13-page-bail-rejection-was-struck-down-because-it/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>A 13-page order rejecting anticipatory bail was struck down because it discussed evidence in detail — a reminder that bail decisions are not mini-trials and delay violates liberty.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>137 Hindi teachers lose jobs after 30 years — here's why the court said it's legal</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/137-hindi-teachers-lose-jobs-after-30-years-heres/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled their 1988 appointments were void from day one because the schools skipped a mandatory selection process. Even decades of work couldn't fix that.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>137 teachers hired without selection board — Supreme Court says all appointments void</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/137-teachers-hired-without-selection-board-supreme-court-says/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>For 30 years, Hindi teachers in Odisha were appointed, terminated, reinstated, and terminated again. The Supreme Court just ended the cycle: the original hires were illegal from day one.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>142 acres assigned to SC/ST farmers in 1960s — now they've lost it all</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/142-acres-assigned-to-scst-farmers-in-1960s-now/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the government's resumption of land that had been transferred without permission, rejecting claims of double jeopardy and compensation.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>15 FIRs, one TV show: Anchor tells Supreme Court 'this is a political attack'</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/15-firs-one-tv-show-anchor-tells-supreme-court/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>Arnab Goswami faced multiple criminal cases across states for the same broadcast. The top court had to decide: free speech or coordinated harassment?</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>15-year-old tagline. Competitor complaint. Court said it's puffery.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/15-year-old-tagline-competitor-complaint-court-said-its/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A 15-year-old tagline survived a competitor's complaint and an ASCI order because the Delhi High Court found it was puffery, not a factual claim</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>150 colleges lost recognition — not for poor teaching, but for a missed deadline.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/150-colleges-lost-recognition-not-for-poor-teaching-but/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Delhi High Court ruled that the NCTE cannot refuse recognition or shut teacher education institutions without following its own mandatory timelines and procedures, no matter the merits</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>16 years of litigation ended because IBPS is not 'State' under Article 12.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/16-years-of-litigation-ended-because-ibps-is-not/</link>
    <category>Constitutional Law</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that IBPS is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, leaving candidates with only civil suits or consumer complaints as remedies.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>17 students accused him. The Supreme Court still quashed his dismissal.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/17-students-accused-him-the-supreme-court-still-quashed/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed a lecturer's dismissal for sexual harassment not because the allegations were false, but because the complaints committee denied him a real and meaningful opportunity to defend himself.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>2 cops beat a man to death in custody. 36 years later, they asked to 'settle' the case. The Supreme Court said no.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/2-cops-beat-a-man-to-death-in-custody/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>The officers were convicted for killing a man at a police station in 1985. After the High Court reduced their charge, they sought to compound the offence — but the top court refused, calling custodial violence a crime against humanity.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>2,000 Gorai families, 4 tankers: the Bombay High Court did the math.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/2000-gorai-families-4-tankers-the-bombay-high-court/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>When the Bombay High Court found four water tankers for over two thousand families grossly insufficient, it turned a municipal failure into a constitutional command that every infrastructure project must now heed.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>21-year-old wife has no job, no income. Court says she doesn't have to travel 150 km for her divorce case.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/21-year-old-wife-has-no-job-no-income/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>She filed for maintenance in Chennai. He filed for annulment in Vellore. The Supreme Court transferred his case to her city, ruling that a financially dependent wife's convenience matters more.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>22 categories. One wrong box. Your case loses two years.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/22-categories-one-wrong-box-your-case-loses-two/</link>
    <category>Commercial Disputes</category>
    <description>The Commercial Courts Act lists twenty-two exhaustive categories of disputes — pick the wrong one and your fast-track suit lands on the ordinary side, losing months.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>25 years apart, but still married. The Supreme Court just changed that.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/25-years-apart-but-still-married-the-supreme-court/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>A couple separated since 1998, with no kids and endless bitterness, couldn't get a divorce—until the court ruled that staying married itself was cruelty.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>25 years apart, still married. SC says: that itself is cruelty.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/25-years-apart-still-married-sc-says-that-itself/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A couple lived together for just 4 years, then spent 25 years in court battles. The Supreme Court finally ended the marriage—not because of who was right, but because the wait itself became a form of cruelty.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>272 workers didn't work for 20 months. They still wanted full salary.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/272-workers-didnt-work-for-20-months-they-still/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>Supreme Court says only wages of those who actually worked during insolvency count as top-priority costs. Others fall lower in the payment queue.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>3 accounts, 3 certificates, 5 purposes: The new MahaRERA regime every promoter must set up now.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/3-accounts-3-certificates-5-purposes-the-new-maharera/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>MahaRERA's discussion paper mandates a tripartite account system with auto-sweep and three certificates per withdrawal, turning banks into co-enforcers and closing loopholes that have stalled thousands of projects.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>3 life convicts denied remission because judge wrote 'not appropriate' — with no reasons</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/3-life-convicts-denied-remission-because-judge-wrote-not/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court says a judge's opinion on remission must explain why, not just say no. A co-accused already got a fresh look.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>30 cents of government land. 16 years of litigation. The State still won.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/30-cents-of-government-land-16-years-of-litigation/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A family occupied government land for decades but the Supreme Court held that long possession alone cannot perfect title against the State without concrete proof of hostile animus.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>30-year-old letter admitted as evidence—court cites convenience</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/30-year-old-letter-admitted-as-evidencecourt-cites-convenience/</link>
    <category>Constitutional Law</category>
    <description>Supreme Court says proving handwriting after three decades is nearly impossible, so old documents get a presumption of genuineness if kept properly.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>30 years of service. State said no pension. One rule changed everything.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/30-years-of-service-state-said-no-pension-one/</link>
    <category>Labour & Employment</category>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court held that Rule 25 of the Pension Rules compels the State to count temporary service, ending a 30-year fight over a pension denied on a technicality.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>300 WhatsApp messages after a rape? Supreme Court says not guilty</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/300-whatsapp-messages-after-a-rape-supreme-court-says/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A married woman accused a man of rape. But the Court found she kept texting him—hundreds of times—after the alleged assault. That changed everything.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>31 years spotless, a medal, then a 10-year sentence on a subordinate's word</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/31-years-spotless-a-medal-then-a-10-year/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>A BSF commandant with a Presidential medal was convicted for smuggling. The actual smugglers walked free. The Supreme Court just threw out the conviction.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>33 kg silver, 3-year deadline: When does the clock start?</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/33-kg-silver-3-year-deadline-when-does-the/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court settles a crucial question: Is the limitation period counted from the day you file a complaint or from when the magistrate takes cognizance?</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>33 kg silver returned? Court says the clock starts ticking when you file complaint, not when judge signs</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/33-kg-silver-returned-court-says-the-clock-starts/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>Amritlal gave 33 kg silver to Shantilal. Shantilal refused to return it. Amritlal filed a complaint 3 years later. The High Court killed the case. The Supreme Court revived it—because the limitation clock starts at filing, not at cognizance.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>33 kg silver returned? No. But the clock starts when you file, not when court acts</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/33-kg-silver-returned-no-but-the-clock-starts/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>A man refused to return silver entrusted to him. The accused argued the case was too late because the magistrate took cognizance after 3 years. The Supreme Court said: the real deadline is the complaint date.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>38 writ petitions later: why your bank LOC may be unconstitutional now.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/38-writ-petitions-later-why-your-bank-loc-may/</link>
    <category>Constitutional Law</category>
    <description>A Bombay High Court ruling strikes down executive memos that let public sector banks ground borrowers at airports, and raises a fundamental question about who can restrict your right to travel.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>4 years in jail, trial hasn't even started. Supreme Court says — enough.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/4-years-in-jail-trial-hasnt-even-started-supreme/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>Javed was arrested at Mumbai airport with fake notes. The NIA took over. Two co-accused got bail. He spent over four years waiting for charges to be framed. The Supreme Court stepped in.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 attackers, 1 charge-sheet: Can a lone man be guilty of murder by mob?</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/5-attackers-1-charge-sheet-can-a-lone-man/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>The High Court said no—only two were initially charged, so Section 149 didn't apply. The Supreme Court disagreed, restoring the murder conviction.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 men convicted of murder based on videotaped confessions. SC says: that's illegal.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/5-men-convicted-of-murder-based-on-videotaped-confessions/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court acquitted five men who spent 22 years in prison for a 2000 murder, ruling that confessions made to police—even on video—are inadmissible under the Evidence Act.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5-month delay, hidden bail facts: SC quashes preventive detention</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/5-month-delay-hidden-bail-facts-sc-quashes-preventive/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>Police proposed detaining a drug accused in June. The state acted in November — and never told the detaining authority he was already out on bail. The Supreme Court says that breaks the 'live link'.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 months after evidence closed, he wanted to ask questions. Court said no.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/5-months-after-evidence-closed-he-wanted-to-ask/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition seeking to administer interrogatories, holding that the defendant's delay of five months after the plaintiff's evidence closed was fatal under the CPC's trial scheme.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 review petitions fail: 'No error' in giving state priority over banks in insolvency</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/5-review-petitions-fail-no-error-in-giving-state/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>Supreme Court rejects challenges to its 2022 ruling that state tax dues rank above financial creditors, saying later bench's doubts can't trigger review.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>52 days late, 18 years wasted — the appeal that never got heard.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/52-days-late-18-years-wasted-the-appeal-that/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside two rigid orders that kept a property appeal unheard for 18 years because of a 52-day delay, reaffirming that substantial justice must trump technical clock-watching</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>54-day gap cost her Rs 10 lakh pension — Supreme Court steps in</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/54-day-gap-cost-her-rs-10-lakh-pension/</link>
    <category>Labour & Employment</category>
    <description>A district judge retired on July 31, 2014. She became a high court judge on September 25, 2014. The government said the 54-day break meant she couldn't blend her service — and calculated her pension as if she'd never been a high court judge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>67 students cleared NEET, studied for years, and still lost their seats.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/67-students-cleared-neet-studied-for-years-and-still/</link>
    <category>Tax Law</category>
    <description>Two state notifications mandating centralized counselling were ignored by a private medical college, and the Supreme Court held that 67 students who entered through a back door could not keep their seats even after years of study.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>7 men attacked a couple in their field. The High Court let them off with time served. Then the Supreme Court stepped in.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/7-men-attacked-a-couple-in-their-field-the/</link>
    <category>Trial Evidence</category>
    <description>The High Court said the injured wife's testimony had contradictions. The Supreme Court said: that's not how you read a police statement.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>8 days late, but Supreme Court says: condone it</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/8-days-late-but-supreme-court-says-condone-it/</link>
    <category>Commercial Disputes</category>
    <description>HUDA filed objections to an arbitration award eight days after the deadline. The lower courts threw it out. The Supreme Court just sent it back for a fresh hearing.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>8 days late: SC says courts can't kill arbitration objections over small delays</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/8-days-late-sc-says-courts-cant-kill-arbitration/</link>
    <category>Commercial Disputes</category>
    <description>HUDA's objections to a Rs 1.19 crore arbitration award were dismissed as time-barred despite being only 8 days late. The Supreme Court says courts must condone short delays if there's a reasonable explanation.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>8 judges were denied pension benefits. The Supreme Court just tore up the rule.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/8-judges-were-denied-pension-benefits-the-supreme-court/</link>
    <category>Tax Law</category>
    <description>District judges elevated to the High Court were told they couldn't get the same provident fund as bar-appointed judges. The Court said: once you're a High Court judge, your past doesn't matter.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>8 men got wildly different sentences for the same crime. SC says no.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/8-men-got-wildly-different-sentences-for-the-same/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>For a Holika Dahan brawl that turned fatal, one accused served 11 months, another 9 years. The Supreme Court found the 'sentence undergone' formula produced an aberration and imposed uniform 5-year terms.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>80 kg ganja seized, but Supreme Court says: case collapses on a technicality</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/80-kg-ganja-seized-but-supreme-court-says-case/</link>
    <category>Family & Matrimonial</category>
    <description>The police mixed the marijuana with green chillies, didn't weigh it separately, and broke the chain of custody. The FSL report became useless.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>80 kg of ganja mixed with chillies — court says weight not proved</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/80-kg-of-ganja-mixed-with-chillies-court-says/</link>
    <category>Civil Litigation</category>
    <description>Police seized bundles of marijuana and green chillies together, never weighed separately. Supreme Court says that makes the commercial quantity charge unprovable.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>82 homebuyers backed his settlement. The Supreme Court let him walk away from insolvency.</title>
    <link>https://theregister.in/blog/82-homebuyers-backed-his-settlement-the-supreme-court-let/</link>
    <category>Criminal Defence</category>
    <description>A Gurgaon builder who failed to deliver flats for 8 years convinced most buyers to give him one more year. The top court agreed—and quashed all insolvency proceedings.</description>
  </item>
</channel></rss>
